On
the economic transition to create new markets worth over $10 trillion
of global GDP growth to save capitalism that will benefit the usual
suspects at YOUR expense. #ClassWar
'Carbon is moving very quickly into a system where it's going to be very close to a currency' ...
Next,
'We start thinking about putting prices on water, on trees, on
biodiversity ... How do we start #tokenizing?': Michael Sheren, Former
Bank of England Advisor #COP27
#NoDealForNature
Capitalism is in
crisis, thus the parasite criminal class lording over humanity are
urging central banks and financial supervisors to #ActNow to save the
global financial system from collapse by facilitating and economic
transition and historic landgrabs & “pioneering a new asset class
based on natural assets & the mechanism to convert them to
financial capital" marketed as mitigations for Climate Change©️ and
#NaturePositive thereby creating new markets worth trillions.
👉From WWF in bankers own words https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IvNqT5aMTw
👉#NYSE:
"natural asset companies" (#NACs) will be listed & traded on its
exchange, "creating a new market whose assets generate trillions of
dollars in #ecosystemservices
annually."https://fortune.com/.../nyse-natural-asset-company-ieg.../
👉
"Natural Asset Company: A corporation designed TO HOLD THE RIGHTS TO
& MANAGE the Ecological Performance of natural assets, e.g. the
productivity & health of natural assets."
https://www.intrinsicexchange.com/en/solution
👉Whitney Webb https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/10/investigative-reports/wall-streets-takeover-of-nature-advances-with-launch-of-new-asset-class/
This expands economic systems that are the main driver of harms and misery.
1. Conceived of by vested interests
Behind
the push for a New Deal for Nature—recently rebranded Nature Positive,
and also referred to as a Global Deal for Nature or a Global Goal for
Nature—lie the world’s most powerful corporations, financial
institutions, behavioural change organisations such as Avaaz, and
conservation NGOs who partner with the world's largest polluters. Human
rights violators WWF lead the charge for this deal, whose 30x30 target
represents what would be the biggest land grab in history from the most
self-sufficient peoples on the planet.
2. Harms those least responsible for destroying biodiversity
The
New Deal for Nature would threaten the further displacement of
Indigenous and tribal peoples as global corporations and the
conservation industry seek control of their lands via the doubling of
Protected Areas (30x30) to maintain and expand their hegemony under the
guise of tackling climate change and protecting "nature". This
represents a new wave of colonisation for peoples in the Global South,
specifically for those in Africa and Asia where colonial or fortress
conservation is still the norm.
3. Expands the very system destroying biodiversity
The
New Deal for Nature, also marketed as Nature Positive, a Global Deal
for Nature or a Global Goal for Nature, would entail creating new
markets worth some $10 trillion of global GDP growth, thereby expanding
an economic system whose activities have been the main driver of
biodiversity loss.
4. Fails to address the main drivers of biodiversity loss
Under
the guise of acting on the climate and ecological crises, what the New
Deal for Nature also entails is a new phase of financialisation and
privatisation of nature (defined as "nature-based solutions" or
"natural climate solutions", "natural capital" or "ecosystem
services"). Yet these market-based solutions fail to address the main
drivers of biodiversity loss, namely overconsumption by the Global
North and an economic system based on the exploitation of people and
planet that seeks to create new markets for consumer goods, destroying
self-sufficiency in the process.
5. Undemocratic
The New Deal for
Nature is being negotiated without any participation from the wider
public. It was originally foreseen to be concluded as part of the
Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework at the UN Convention on
Biological Diversity (CBD COP 15) conference held in China in October
2020 (postponed on five occasions and now scheduled to take place in
December 2022)—without any vote by our local, regional or national
governments, bypassing full democratic scrutiny.