On the economic transition to create new markets worth over $10 trillion of global GDP growth to save capitalism that will benefit the usual suspects at YOUR expense. #ClassWar
'Carbon is moving very quickly into a system where it's going to be very close to a currency' ...
Next, 'We start thinking about putting prices on water, on trees, on biodiversity ... How do we start #tokenizing?': Michael Sheren, Former Bank of England Advisor #COP27
#NoDealForNature
Capitalism is in crisis, thus the parasite criminal class lording over humanity are urging central banks and financial supervisors to #ActNow to save the global financial system from collapse by facilitating and economic transition and historic landgrabs & “pioneering a new asset class based on natural assets & the mechanism to convert them to financial capital" marketed as mitigations for Climate Change©️ and #NaturePositive thereby creating new markets worth trillions.
👉From WWF in bankers own words https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IvNqT5aMTw
👉#NYSE: "natural asset companies" (#NACs) will be listed & traded on its exchange, "creating a new market whose assets generate trillions of dollars in #ecosystemservices annually."https://fortune.com/.../nyse-natural-asset-company-ieg.../
👉 "Natural Asset Company: A corporation designed TO HOLD THE RIGHTS TO & MANAGE the Ecological Performance of natural assets, e.g. the productivity & health of natural assets."
https://www.intrinsicexchange.com/en/solution
👉Whitney Webb https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/10/investigative-reports/wall-streets-takeover-of-nature-advances-with-launch-of-new-asset-class/
This expands economic systems that are the main driver of harms and misery.  
1. Conceived of by vested interests
Behind the push for a New Deal for Nature—recently rebranded Nature Positive, and also referred to as a Global Deal for Nature or a Global Goal for Nature—lie the world’s most powerful corporations, financial institutions, behavioural change organisations such as Avaaz, and conservation NGOs who partner with the world's largest polluters. Human rights violators WWF lead the charge for this deal, whose 30x30 target represents what would be the biggest land grab in history from the most self-sufficient peoples on the planet.
2. Harms those least responsible for destroying biodiversity
The New Deal for Nature would threaten the further displacement of Indigenous and tribal peoples as global corporations and the conservation industry seek control of their lands via the doubling of Protected Areas (30x30) to maintain and expand their hegemony under the guise of tackling climate change and protecting "nature". This represents a new wave of colonisation for peoples in the Global South, specifically for those in Africa and Asia where colonial or fortress conservation is still the norm.
3. Expands the very system destroying biodiversity
The New Deal for Nature, also marketed as Nature Positive, a Global Deal for Nature or a Global Goal for Nature, would entail creating new markets worth some $10 trillion of global GDP growth, thereby expanding an economic system whose activities have been the main driver of biodiversity loss.
4. Fails to address the main drivers of biodiversity loss
Under the guise of acting on the climate and ecological crises, what the New Deal for Nature also entails is a new phase of financialisation and privatisation of nature (defined as "nature-based solutions" or "natural climate solutions", "natural capital" or "ecosystem services"). Yet these market-based solutions fail to address the main drivers of biodiversity loss, namely overconsumption by the Global North and an economic system based on the exploitation of people and planet that seeks to create new markets for consumer goods, destroying self-sufficiency in the process.
5. Undemocratic
The New Deal for Nature is being negotiated without any participation from the wider public. It was originally foreseen to be concluded as part of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework at the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD COP 15) conference held in China in October 2020 (postponed on five occasions and now scheduled to take place in December 2022)—without any vote by our local, regional or national governments, bypassing full democratic scrutiny.