Vaccines versus natural immunity

"Although deaths from measles in the United States decreased steadily throughout the 20th century—from approximately 12 per 100,000 population in 1912 to
 approximately 0.2 per 100,000 population in 1960—mortality rates declined markedly after a measles vaccine was licensed in 1963"
https://www.medscape.com/answers/300455-107822/what-is-the-mortality-and-morbidity-of-measles-virus-pneumonia
What is the mortality and morbidity of measles virus pneumonia?

Comment: A natural decline because of better hygiene and plumbing from 120 per million to 2 per million.
Natural measles infection protects you later in life from some form of cancers and natural immunity is lifelong.
Also: Measles do not ptotect you from getting measles and spreading measles
Links:
links22/extras22/Keyword-Measles.html

nks22/extras22/Measles-Part-II.html

links22/extras22/Measles-Part-III.html

links22/extras22/TH1&TH2.html

The 2 life's per million the vaccines save, might be later lost to cancer and the aluminum in those vaccines contributes to autism, diabetes and other illnesses.
Propaganda tries to tell us us that 2 life's per million allegedly saved by vaccines are more important than the 118 life's saved through better hygiene and nutrition.
The same people promote those toxic vaccines in Africa instead of promoting better hygiene and nutrition

What about Polio?
You got fooled. See the videos by Bergman about Polio, measles and the vaccine court.

https://www.bitchute.com/channel/johnbergman/
His chanel
https://www.bitchute.com/video/wDJRhhb8XRLc/
Truth Vs Lies About Flu Vaccines *Updated*
https://www.bitchute.com/video/5kdUajD9JNv9/
Vaccine Ignorance - Measles And Polio

https://www.bitchute.com/video/IFvsdqdN18po/
Autoimmune Disease And Vaccines

Important studies: Will open up a new page here

https://brownstone.org/articles/how-likely-is-reinfection-following-covid-recovery/
How Likely Is Reinfection Following Covid Recovery?

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-revelations-in-the-us-whats-happening
New revelations in the US + what's happening in Israel today
If you want to protect yourself from COVID, it’s simple and obvious: wear a 3M 7502 mask with a P100 filter. Done. But they never tell you that! Never! Nobody tells you that. Instead, they all tell you to do an intervention (wear a cloth, surgical, or N95 mask) which won’t protect you at all, and can potentially harm you (oxygen deprivation + risk of respiratory viruses)
And then they compound their bad advice on prevention and treatment by mandating you take a vaccine that kills 15 people for every person it might ever save. And even if the vaccine was safe, it still causes negative efficacy (makes you more likely to be infected compared to not taking it). This just shows you how inept the authorities (and “experts”) are.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35113901/
Pre-infection 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels and association with severity of COVID-19 illness
Patients with vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL) were 14 times more likely to have severe or critical disease than patients with 25(OH)D ≥40 ng/mL

https://covid.us.org/2020/05/21/vitamin-d-versus-covid-19-part-one/
Vitamin D versus Covid-19: part one
The study found that only 3.6% of persons with normal Vitamin D levels had severe or critical cases of Covid-19, whereas 79.2% of persons deficient in Vitamin D had severe or critical cases.
< A 22 times higher risk of hospitalization if vitamin D deficiencies. You will need vitamin C and Zinc too, for it to work >
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/2/411
Vitamin D Supplementation to Prevent COVID-19 Infections and Deaths—Accumulating Evidence from Epidemiological and Intervention Studies Calls for Immediate Action
A recent clinic-based cohort study among 185 patients diagnosed with and treated
for COVID-19 at a University Hospital in Germany showed more than 80% lower risk of
invasive mechanical ventilation or death (primary endpoint) and more than 90% lower
mortality among patients with sufficient vitamin D levels compared with patients with
vitamin D deficiency


SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees had a 13.06-fold (95% CI, 8.08 to 21.11) increased risk
for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously
infected, when the first event (infection or vaccination) occurred during January and
February of 2021. The increased risk was significant (P<0.001) for symptomatic
disease as well. When allowing the infection to occur at any time before vaccination
(from March 2020 to February 2021), evidence of waning natural immunity was
demonstrated, though SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees had a 5.96-fold (95% CI, 4.85 to 7.33) increased risk for breakthrough infection and a 7.13-fold (95% CI, 5.51 to 9.21)
increased risk for symptomatic disease. SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees were also at a
greater risk for COVID-19-related-hospitalizations compared to those that were
previously infected.
Conclusions:
This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger
protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the
Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced
immunity. Individuals who were both previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and
given a single dose of the vaccine gained additional protection against the Delta
Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity:
reinfections versus breakthrough infections
https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415

https://bigpharmanews.com/2021-10-24-take-covid-vax-never-full-immunity-again.html
If you take the covid vax, you can NEVER achieve full immunity again – government stats unveil the horrifying truth

https://brownstone.org/articles/79-research-studies-affirm-naturally-acquired-immunity-to-covid-19-documented-linked-and-quoted/
142 Research Studies Affirm Naturally Acquired Immunity to Covid-19: Documented, Linked, and Quoted

Results
Of 50 patients treated with calcifediol, one required admission to the ICU (2%), while of 26 untreated patients, 13 required admission (50 %) p value X2 Fischer test p < 0.001. Univariate Risk Estimate Odds Ratio for ICU in patients with Calcifediol treatment versus without Calcifediol treatment: 0.02 (95 %CI 0.002−0.17). Multivariate Risk Estimate Odds Ratio for ICU in patients with Calcifediol treatment vs Without Calcifediol treatment ICU (adjusting by Hypertension and T2DM): 0.03 (95 %CI: 0.003-0.25). Of the patients treated with calcifediol, none died, and all were discharged, without complications. The 13 patients not treated with calcifediol, who were not admitted to the ICU, were discharged. Of the 13 patients admitted to the ICU, two died and the remaining 11 were discharged.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960076020302764?via%3Dihub
“Effect of calcifediol treatment and best available therapy versus best available therapy on intensive care unit admission and mortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19: A pilot randomized clinical study”